The Reboot Is Here!


As you may know, the WISE mission has continued to scan the sky during the last few years—collecting more images for us to search.   So we’ve started uploading new batches of subjects for you to classify that incorporate new WISE data.

These new subjects are improved in at least four ways:

  1. They include two entire new years of data, so they cover a 50% longer time span. That means movers move farther and dipoles look brighter.
  2. The Poisson noise and the amplifier noise (the stripes) are reduced by at least 41%, sometimes by a factor of up to 10 in regions near the ecliptic poles.
  3. All the images have been realigned, so stationary stars subtract out better.  Some of the artifacts and ghosts have been averaged away in the process too.
  4. Planet 9 and other solar system planets no longer hop and jump.  They are simply ordinary dipoles or movers.  (If they exist.)

We’ve also taken this opportunity to fix some of the broken links in the metadata and add some handy new ones, like links to WiseView  and to WISE images on LegacySurveys. Now, it might not be obvious immediately that you’re looking at a reboot image; they might look at first glance to be just as noisy as the pre-reboot images you’re used to.  That’s because we cranked up the gain to match the noise reduction!  So they images look just as noisy, but now the objects you’re looking for will be at least 41% brighter.  You can always tell you’re looking at a reboot subject if the metadata includes links to WiseView and LegacySurveys and doesn’t say anything about the motion of planet nine.

Now, there’s something important to be aware of when you’re using the reboot data. There are still four frames like you’re used to.  But now the biggest time interval is between the first and second frames.   Previously, dipoles tended to flip sides between frames 2 and 3.  But now, the dipoles will tend to flip between frames 1 and 2.  We’ll be updating the tutorials and field guide to illustrate this change (and if you have any nice examples that you think we ought to show, please bring them to our attention).

Nearby Y dwarf WISE 0855 before and after the reboot. The brown dwarf (moving red dot, upper left) moves farther and faster in the reboot flipbook (right), and the stars dance less.  The biggest time step, when you see the red dot move the farthest, is between frames 1 and 2 in the reboot flipbook,

Unfortunately, each new subject will have its own new TALK page, even if it covers the same region os sky as an older subject.  But there will often be a link in the metadata to the old TALK page (if it exists).  There will also be links in the metadata to the old TALK pages of the adjacent subtiles, to help you track a dipole or mover that seems to go off the edge of the image.

We will be re-uploading the whole sky bit by bit over the next few months.  This is a big project.  But we’re starting with a sector that we have not yet looked at before so there there should be some nice new things to discover right away.

Thanks for all the hard work you put in so far—you made it through about 2/3 of the sky once already!   Now we’re gonna start fresh and kick it up a notch.  Have fun!

Marc Kuchner





First Observing Proposal of the Season

Fall is just around the corner here in the northern hemisphere, so it’s the time of year when we write observing proposals!  And last week, we submitted the first Backyard Worlds: Planet 9 proposal of the season–to follow up some of our brown dwarf candidates using the Astrophysical Research Consortium (ARC) 3.5 meter telescope at Apache Point Observatory.  We asked for half a night of time on Near-Infrared Camera & Fabry-Perot Spectrometer (NIC-FPS), to perform J band photometry of 10 objects.  Photometry means you take a picture of the object and sometimes a picture of a reference star, and you use the image to figure out how bright your object is.  J band corresponds to a wavelength of light of about 1.25 microns, about the size of a virus or a particle of soot.

Image result for apache point observatory arc 3.5
ARC 3.5 meter telescope at Apache Point Observatory, New Mexico.

Here’s why we we need these brightness measurements (the photometry).  While many of our brown dwarfs have infrared photometry from surveys like 2MASS and Pan-STARRS, the reddest, coldest, and probably the most interesting objects are too faint for these surveys!  2MASS went as faint as about 16th magnitude in J band.  Pan-STARRS data goes down to about 21st magnitude in y band (a wavelength of around 1.02 microns). But ultracool brown dwarfs are faint, faint, faint. So we need to make our own measurements.

Once we have the new photometry, we will be able to do two new things.  First, we will be able to get much better estimates of the spectral types of these objects. As you may recall, the spectral type of the coldest brown dwarfs is Y.  Only 25 Y dwarfs are presently known.  T dwarfs are the next coldest, but hundreds of T dwarfs are have already been discovered, so Y dwarfs are much more exciting.  So far, all we know about the targets we have in mind is that they have WISE colors that are similar to those of Y dwarfs (i.e. brighter in W2 than W1 by at least 2.5 magnitudes).  But they might still turn out to be late T dwarfs. The near infrared photometry will help make that distinction.

Second, we will be able to apply for time on still larger telescopes to get their near-infrared spectra.  The photometry will tell us what instrument we will need, and how long we need to keep the shutter open while were are collecting the spectra.  These spectra will tell us for sure what the spectral type is (Y or T?), and maybe even lead to a big discovery.

Here’s a link to the full proposal, if you are curious: APO_BWs The final target list is not set yet, but the 10 targets that meet our cutoff of W1-W2 > 2.5 were found by Guillaume Colin, Sam Goodman and Dan Caselden.   Nice work, guys!

I’m sure we’ll be writing several more telescope proposals over the next month—stay tuned!










Our First Paper: the Discovery of Brown Dwarf WISEA 1101+5400

Our first paper was published in the Astrophysical Journal Letters, Volume 841, Number 2 on May 24.   Hooray!!   (It may be easier to read here.)

The paper announces the discovery of our first brown dwarf, shows a spectrum we took of the brown dwarf, and describes the Backyard Worlds: Planet 9 project. There’s a press release from the American Museum of Natural History, a nice NPR story about it featuring Rosa Castro, and several other news stories.

Of course, this paper is already out-of-date.  In the time it took to write the paper, you’ve discovered at least twelve more good brown dwarf candidates.  And we used those discoveries to make an even better estimate of the sensitivity of our search than the one that appears in the paper. But let’s talk more about the paper and our first discovery, a source called WISEA 1101+5400 which we now know is a real brown dwarf, spectral type T5.5.   Here is WISEA 1101+5400’s flipbook.

You may recall that shortly after launch, we were all excited about a faint dipole/mover, which Bob Fletcher had flagged on talk and Tamara Stajic reported on the Think-You’ve-Got-One form.  That’s WISEA 1101+5400.  A few weeks later, science team member Jackie Faherty nabbed a spectrum of it using NASA’s Infrared Telescope Facility.  Here’s a nice plot of the spectrum, created by science team member Joe Filippazzo comparing the our object’s spectrum (black) to the spectrum of another T5.5 brown dwarf (red).  It’s a great match! The extra wiggles in our spectrum are simply noise.


The quality of the match demonstrates that WISEA 1101+5400 is indeed a brown dwarf, and tells us that its temperature is in the range 900-1500 Kelvin (1200 – 2200 degrees Fahrenheit).  We can tell the temperature range by looking at what molecules show up in the spectrum.  The spectrum shows features associated with water, methane, iron hydride, potassium, and molecular hydrogen, labelled above.  If the brown dwarf were hotter or cooler, the relative sizes of the dips in the spectrum from each molecule would be different.

Knowing the brown dwarf’s spectral type also teaches us roughly how bright it is, intrinsically.  And since we know that the brightness of an astronomical object falls off as the inverse distance to it, squared, we can compare our images of WISEA 1101+5400 to those of other brown dwarfs to estimate its distance:  roughly 34 parsecs or about 111 light years.  For comparison, the closest known brown dwarf is the binary Luhman 16AB at 6.59 light years.

So what does this discovery mean for our understanding of brown dwarfs?  Well, there are already a few hundred T dwarfs known–and this new one turns out to be somewhat run-of-the mill.  It’s not super cool, and it’s not in a moving group, for example.  Its infrared colors are close to the average colors for brown dwarfs with this spectral type.  So we haven’t shattered any paradigms or broken any records with this object just yet.

But the discovery is a dramatic proof-of-concept.  Just the fact that we found it, only six days after launch, shows that we’re on the right track toward lots more discoveries.  Also, Zooniverse founder Chris Lintott tells me that our paper now holds the record for fastest publication from a Zooniverse project.   How cool is that?

This is a moment to celebrate.  Congratulations to us!!   Let’s make some more discoveries and write some more papers together.



Hi!  Welcome to the new Backyard Worlds: Planet 9 blog. My name is Marc Kuchner, and I’m excited to begin this search with you.  I suppose you could call me the PI of this project, though I blame Dr. Jackie Faherty for coming up with the idea for it.

One day, I went to visit the Carnegie Institution Department of Terrestrial Magnetism, where Jackie used to work. I went there to give a talk about another citizen science project of mine called “Disk Detective”.  Disk is a super-fun ongoing Zooniverse project where we study images of stars using data from NASA’s WISE telescope. After I gave my talk, Jackie came up to me and said: hey, what about examining the moving objects in the WISE images? They could be brown dwarfs or even planet nine!  We should launch a new citizen science project to look at those.

DiskDetective with P.I. Marc Kuchner, NASA/GSFC
Here I am giving a talk about Disk Detective.


I had my hands full with Disk Detective and other projects, so I more or less ignored Jackie’s idea at first. But then one day I met Dr. Adam Schneider.  Adam had been studying moving objects in the WISE images, and he needed help.  He had looked at one million WISE images all by himself, hoping to find new nearby brown dwarfs.  He had found many!  But he was sure the best ones, the coldest, nearest ones, were still hiding in the data.  Wouldn’t it be great if he had some friends with fresh eyes to dig deeper into the data with him?   A citizen science project would be just the thing.

Dr. Jackie Faherty

I still wasn’t quite sold on the idea.  But then I met Dr. Aaron Meisner.  Aaron had just reprocessed all the data from WISE in a new way, dividing it up into several epochs so you could easily see moving objects.  He was beginning to scan through the new data set looking for evidence of planet nine. But even with the latest computers and algorithms, his search was bogged down in the galactic plane, where moving objects can easily get lost in crowded fields of stars.  Aaron needed help with his search, too.

Jackie, Adam and Aaron and I put our heads together, and with lots of help and patience from Laura Trouille and the other folks at Zooniverse,  we came up with this project: Backyard Worlds: Planet 9. Brown dwarf expert Joe Fillipazzo, another expert on brown dwarfs, and Shawn Domagal-Goldman, an expert on planetary atmospheres, joined the crew.  Matt Beasley from Asteroid Zoo shared his wisdom.  Lots of wonderful beta testers showed up.  And here we are, after about twelve months of work, just about to launch.  Wow.

But wait, there’s more!  During the beta test, I learned that, in a way, this project had been dreamed up by citizen scientists even before invited them to participate in it. On January 24, 2016, a new topic appeared in the Zooniverse Project Building TALK forum, “planet 9, could someone with access to big telescope data set up a new project to search.”  Users @TLSanders, @johnfairweather, @PolishPlanetPursuer, @JeanTate, @zutopian, @PlanetGazer8350, @planetaryscience, and @MvGulik began debating the evidence for a ninth planet, and tinkering with new projects to find it. I hope Backyard Worlds: Planet 9 lives up to their hopes.

“planet 9, could someone with access to big telescope data set up a new project to search”

If you helped with our beta test, thank you!  We made many improvements to the site thanks to your feedback.  The flipbooks now play automatically and continue to play (unless you stop them).  The images now are labeled with celestial coordinates so you can easily look up the interesting sources you find in other astronomical catalogs.  There are more examples of each different kind of object of interest (movers, dipoles, planet 9) in the field guide.  I think the site really rocks.  But if you think of more ideas on how to improve it, please drop us a line on TALK.

And thank you to everyone for giving this new project a try.  We’ll  post more articles and stories right here–you’ll be hearing from other members of the science team as time goes by–and we’ll be chatting with you on TALK.  We’re looking forward to getting to know you, and we hope you make a really cool discovery!

(That’s a pun, by the way.  Brown dwarfs and planet nine are cool because they have very low temperatures.)

Marc Kuchner